<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML with no root element: Saxon & XT vs. Xalan

Subject: Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML with no root element: Saxon & XT vs. Xalan
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:29:34 +0100
> So it appears to me that anything referenced by &xxx; *might* just be
> character data.

Oh yes of course, it may not have any element tags, but it is always
parsed as XML.  You can't, in XML, include a text file and ask that it
not be parsed. It may just be characters but it is always (in SGML
terms) _P_CDATA: and < or & will be taken as XML markup.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re[2]: [xsl] This can't be right, X, Michael R. Hahn Thread [xsl] template stack trace, Richard Emberson
RE: [xsl] This can't be right, XML , Elliotte Rusty Harol Date Re: [xsl] template stack trace, Oliver Becker
Month