|
Subject: RE: [xsl]l "& #xA0; vs & #160;" version 2 proposal. From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 09:26:23 +0100 |
> Considering the number of questions this raises, > How many rules would be broken if were added > to an XSLT engine? I.e. put in as part of the rec? > What exactly are you proposing? Mandating that with the HTML output method, the Unicode character "no-break space" should always be serialized as " ", perhaps? My main concern about this is that it would open the floodgates, creating pressure to standardize other aspects of the serialized output. I think I'd prefer this to be left to implementers. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl]l "& #xA0; vs & #160;" ver, Rafael 'Dido' Sevill | Thread | Re: [xsl]l "& #xA0; vs & #160;" ver, Trevor Nash |
| Re: [xsl] correction: how to get ne, Samuzeau Pascal | Date | Re: [xsl]l "& #xA0; vs & #160;" ver, Trevor Nash |
| Month |