Subject: RE: [xsl] xml2xml problem! From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 18:15:29 +0100 |
> Could you articulate more what are the cases where you can't visual > design the mapping ? >From what I've seen of the "connect the boxes" visual mapping tools, the technique works well in cases where the structure of the source and target are similar (which was true of the problem that our opportunistic advertiser was responding to). The technique doesn't work well where the structures are dissimilar, for example where there is a grouping problem, or hierarchic inversion, or basically any change in the way that relationships are represented (e.g. changing from hierarchic representation of a relationship to ID/IDREF representation, or vice versa). But of course it might be that some of the tools can handle some of these structural transformations as well. Mike Kay Software AG XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xml2xml problem!, Ivan Pedruzzi | Thread | RE: [xsl] xml2xml problem!, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Re: Preceding Ancestors, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | RE: [xsl] Preceding Ancestors, Michael Kay |
Month |