Subject: Re: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Versio n 1.0 From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:05:28 +0100 |
> Incidentally, I'd encourage as much comment as possible on > this document > from the XSLT user community. Mike, Do you know if anyone's reading the comment list (given that the archive is all spam I'd not be surprised if everyone had unsubscribed...) I'd be nice to at least get an acknowledgement that comments had arrived, otherwise all discussion is likely to take place on this list which isn't a totally bad idea as there's probably more XPath experience here than anywhere else, but I suspect the authors of this document aren't subscribed to xsl-list (or if they are, they are keeping very quiet:-) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 , DPawson | Thread | RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 , Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] RE: Returning A Tree, Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] recursively descending throug, Utah Ingersoll |
Month |