Subject: RE: [xsl] Fast Processor XSLt From: "Eugene Kuznetsov" <eugene@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:27:54 -0400 |
Michael Kay [mailto:mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx] : > > I use the MSXML processor XSLt, and my applications have > > occupy many time to > > transform. > > Someone know a processor XSLt most fast to run in local > > Windows platform (not Web)? > > > > I suggest you look at your stylesheets to work out why they are slow. It's > very unlikely you will solve your performance problems by switching to a > different processor. It's much more likely that you can solve the problems > by changing your code. I think it really depends on the application -- in a commercial setting, it is much cheaper to switch to a high-speed XSLT engine than to consume developer time to rewrite stylesheets or, worse, add non-portable extensions to get around an XSLT interpreter's performance problems. In a non-profit or hobby setting, where spending money is not possible, hand-optimization is obviously the only option. (Mike had a list of XSLT performance hints, but my link seems broken; there have also been some more specific fixes on this list). Maybe you could post your XSL? And yes, given MSXML's speed advantages, it is probably true that switching to another free XSLT interpreter is unlikely to help. (But not impossible -- some engines do have non-uniform performance for different kinds of processing). \\ Eugene Kuznetsov \\ eugene@xxxxxxxxxxxxx \\ DataPower Technology, Inc. \\ http://www.datapower.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Fast Processor XSLt, Jorge Maestre | Thread | Re: [xsl] Fast Processor XSLt, Daniel Veillard |
RE: MSXML3 -> WAS: [xsl] XML Proce, Ben Robb | Date | Re: [xsl] Fast Processor XSLt, Daniel Veillard |
Month |