Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: RE: Namespace incompatibility b/n XPath 2.0 Data Model and XPath 1.0 (Was Re: XML schema general convert with XSLT (namespaces..)) From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:29:11 -0700 |
Dmitre Novatchev wrote: > The XPath 2.0 Data Model document doesn't mention that there is a change in the > above definition. Any misunderstanding would have been avoided, if this had been > explained in the document. Besides going beyond the scope of the data model document (which talks nothing about axes or other constructs of the XPath language), such an explanation would be too committal given the WD status of the document and the editorial note that states "this is still the subject of debate". The implication here is that there are other proposals on the table. Evan Lenz XYZFind Corp. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: RE: Namespace incompatibi, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Java extension functions, Matthew L. Avizinis |
[xsl] Re: RE: Namespace incompatibi, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Adding structure to a doc, Jörg Heinicke |
Month |