Re: [xsl] XSL Standards?

Michael Kay wrote:
> 
> I think it was just priorities, coupled with insufficient experience in the
> early days of actual user requirements. Extension functions were thought to
> be needed primarily for access to external resources, and to algorithms (e.g
> regexp) which no one would dream of coding in XSLT. Of course that changed
> over time and the requirement to write extension functions in XSLT is now in
> the published XSLT 2.0 requirements.
> 
Thanks - sorry for the extended moan!

Francis.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSL Standards? Francis Norton - Mon, 01 Oct 2001 21:18:41 +0100 Michael Kay - Mon, 1 Oct 2001 23:49:58 +0100 Francis Norton - Tue, 02 Oct 2001 08:36:57 +0100 <= David Carlisle - Tue, 2 Oct 2001 09:12:55 +0100 Francis Norton - Tue, 02 Oct 2001 15:07:39 +0100 <Possible follow-ups> Seaborne, Mark - Tue, 2 Oct 2001 16:44:59 +0200 Patrick Moore - Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:57:13 -0700

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] XSL Standards?, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSL Standards?, David Carlisle
[xsl] table type output in text fro, Praveen G	Date	[xsl] problem with proper numbering, Andreas Putscher
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home