<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [xsl] Re: Re: "*|@*|text()" vs. "node()"

Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Re: "*|@*|text()" vs. "node()"
From: "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 11:28:46 +0100
> XML, for historical reasons rooted in typographical markup, distinguishes
> "content" from "properties". Content is the information intended for the
> reader, properties are extra information intended for the software
> processing that information. This history explains why we have the split
> between elements and attributes (logically, attributes aren't necessary at
> all), and explains why they are treated differently in the object model.
>
> Mike Kay

but unfortunately this model is not 100% appropriate ( as all models ) for
certain situations, but can still adapt to the odd cases.

for ex. RDF with dublin core attributes, buried in <head></head> is a good
example of when all content must be attributes.

cheers, jim fuller






 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
RE: [xsl] Re: Re: "*|@*|text()" vs., Michael Kay Thread [xsl] Re: Re: "*|@*|text()" vs. "no, Dimitre Novatchev
Re: [xsl] msxml2: What can be used , cutlass Date RE: [xsl] Re: Re: "*|@*|text()" vs., Michael Kay
Month