Subject: Re: [xsl] transformation problem From: Jörg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@xxxxxx> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 02:20:49 +0200 |
Sorry for the mistake, but <xsl:element> was correct ;-) Of course it has to be <xsl:element name="{@name}"> Joerg ----- Original Message ----- From: "Trevor Nash" <tcn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 7:23 PM Subject: Re: [xsl] transformation problem > On Sat, 06 Oct 2001 19:27:23 +0530, you wrote: > > >Hello all, > >even this doesnt work!! > >here is what you we are doing : > >@name will return a node-set containing the attribute node with name "name". > correct > > > > >possible problems i can think of:( even i am a beginner !!) > >1.can this node be converted to a string(ie will it return the > >string-value of the node).? > Yes > > >2.can we put "variables" in the name attribute of xsl:element tag? > Yes, by means of an 'attribute value template', i.e. putting curly > brackets in it. > > > > >i think more experienced people around would clarify...... > > > > > >Manu > > > > > > > >>Sorry, but this will never, never work! But there is a really easy > >>alternative: > >> > >><xsl:element name="@name"/> > This will never work either ;-)) > Did you try what I posted yesterday? The above will try to create an > element with name @name (literally) which is of course illegal. You > want the value of @name, i.e. as I said before > <xsl:element name="{@name}"/> > with the curly brackets. > >> > >>Joerg XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] transformation problem, Trevor Nash | Thread | Re: [xsl] transformation problem, Manu KY |
Re: [xsl] XSL-T to map a D(A)G, Goetz Bock | Date | Re: [xsl] transformation problem, Manu KY |
Month |