Subject: RE: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (can't differentiate unqualified locals)? From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:20:22 +0200 |
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Michael Kay > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 1:10 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (can't differentiate > unqualified locals)? > > > > Michael> (4) people don't understand the arbitrariness of some of > > Michael> the rules, e.g. that the default namespace can go out of > > Michael> scope for descendants but an explicit namespace can't > > > > I'm one of those people - can you give an illustration please? > > > You can say xmlns="" to cancel the default namespace declaration, but you > can't do xmlns:xyz="" to cancel a non-default namespace declaration. However, some XML parsers do not catch this: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3040 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (, Colin Paul Adams |
Re: [xsl] Serializing external XML , Jeni Tennison | Date | RE: [xsl] Numbered Lists, Michael Kay |
Month |