Subject: Re: [xsl] Are these two the equivalent? From: Jörg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@xxxxxx> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 16:18:05 +0200 |
Hi Nicholas, you must divide the "@style"s in the second example not by '|' but by 'or'. Joerg > Hello All, > I have two ways of what I think should achieve the same result > > Example 1 gives me what I want, Example 2 does not. To me they are the > same...If they are different, could someone explain to me why the second > does not give me what I want. > > Thanks in advance, > Nicholas Waltham > > Example 1: > <xsl:template > match="p[@style='L1'][preceding-sibling::p[last()][@style='L1']|preceding-si > bling::p[last()][@style='L2']|preceding-sibling::p[last()][@style='L3']]"> > <xsl:apply-templates/> > </xsl:template> > > Example 2: > <xsl:template > match="p[@style='L1'][preceding-sibling::p[last()][@style='L1'|@style='L2'|@ > style='L3']]"> > <xsl:apply-templates/> > </xsl:template> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Are these two the equivalent?, Nicholas Waltham | Thread | Re: [xsl] Are these two the equival, Trevor Nash |
[xsl] [ANN] XSLfast: Authoring tool, Stephan Albers | Date | Re: [xsl] Are these two the equival, Trevor Nash |
Month |