Subject: RE: [xsl] schema-1 (was something about keys, a long while ago) From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:49:00 -0500 |
> The case of attributes would have been more touchy (maybe the attributes > were really a bad idea in XML, after all) but I am convinced we could > find a way to express the PSVI by adding elements and attributes in a > specific namespace instead of creating new information items... I almost started down this path but found I didn't understand the guts well enough to come up with a plausible syntax and/or example. This certainly would get me what I need. Moreover, unless I get paranoid about trying to reflect super classes and multiple inheritance I believe that this would suffice for just about all needs? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] schema-1 (was something a, Hunsberger, Peter | Thread | [xsl] ANN: Pretty XML Tree Viewer, Mike Brown |
RE: [xsl] xsl:number again, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] schema-1 (was something a, Elliotte Rusty Harol |
Month |