Subject: RE: [xsl] How to read the encoding of an XML document From: "Diamond, Jason" <Jason.Diamond@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:47:49 -0600 |
> > Since most Unicode characters have a value that's less than 0xFFFF, > > most characters will only require two bytes to encode. > but you're just repeating Chris:-) > The XML definition of character does not rely on unicode having assigned > a name to the slot, and I reckon there are more numbers less than 10FFFF > which are greater then FFFF than less than FFFF, so I win:-) You're right, of course--there are (potentially) more characters above 0xFFFF than below it. I guess I meant to say that virtually all (in other words, most) of the characters that we actually use in our documents have values that are less than 0xFFFF. In fact, I think it's safe to say that I've personally never (intentionally, at least) generated a document that contained a character above 0xFFFF. I doubt if I've even strayed above 255 (but then I don't get out much. :-) Jason. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] How to read the encoding , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] How to read the encoding , David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] How to read the encoding , David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] adding an attribute, Jarno . Elovirta |
Month |