Subject: RE: [xsl] reliability of MSXML From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 13:52:59 -0000 |
> As a result, while Saxon 6.4.4 does evering all right, MSXML > 3.0 give me the following error: > This is the result of a concerted attempt on my part to cast Microsoft in a bad light: I deliberately put features in my product to make it appear that MSXML is full of bugs. ;-) MSXML3 is conformant to XSLT 1.0 here, Saxon isn't. Saxon is implementing a feature from the XSLT 1.1 working draft. If I had known how long it would take to get XSLT 2.0 out, I would probably have rolled Saxon back to the 1.0 level, but I didn't and I didn't, and it's too late now! Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] reliability of MSXML, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] reliability of MSXML, Kevin Jones |
RE: [xsl] Testing for certain combi, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] reliability of MSXML, Daniel Veillard |
Month |