Subject: Re: [xsl] Change an XSLT top-level parameter From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:26:59 +0000 |
David C. wrote: > ah well in that case you don't mind editing the file to add the parameter > (which was really what I was asking) so in that case what I do is invent > myself a new namespace (say mailto:Robert.Stuart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) and > in the doument go > <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="stylesheet.xsl"?> > <top-level-element > normal-attribute1="x" > normal-attribute2="y" > xmlns:param="Robert.Stuart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" > param:p1="val1" > param:p2="val2"> In the course of thinking about the point of embedded stylesheets, I thought of the following possibility for the same kind of situation: <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="#localStylesheet"?> <!DOCTYPE type-level-element [ <!ATTLIST xsl:stylesheet id ID #REQUIRED> ]> <top-level-element normal-attribute1="x" normal-attribute2="y"> <xsl:stylesheet id="localStylesheet" version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:import href="stylesheet.xsl" /> <xsl:param name="p1" select="val1" /> <xsl:param name="p2" select="val2" /> <xsl:template match="xsl:stylesheet" /> </xsl:stylesheet> ... </top-level-element> This has the disadvantage of being a lot more long-winded but the advantage of allowing you to set the parameter values to things other than strings very easily. This kind of per-document customisation of a stylesheet is the only good reason I could think of for embedded stylesheets. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Change an XSLT top-level , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Change an XSLT top-level , David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] How can I improve this, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] Variable in XPath..., David Carlisle |
Month |