Subject: RE: [xsl] reliability of MSXML From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:44:30 -0000 |
> I assume SAXON has completely unified the two notions and so > this would > requires a lot of code rewrite to (re)implement the > distinction, even to > simply raise a warning ... Yes. I did look at this once, and it turned out to be quite difficult to revert to the 1.0 behavior. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] reliability of MSXML, Daniel Veillard | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: lookup-table thoughts, Tom Myers |
Re: [xsl] Problem with <!Doctype> i, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: lookup-table thoughts, Mark Nahabedian |
Month |