Subject: RE: [xsl] Using Transforms and #include file From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:38:37 -0600 |
> 1. My site has a lot of functionality all in one page because of the > ".innerHTML" technique I'm using. I only need specific scripts for specific > content so I didn't want to mass load all script. Fair enough. However, breaking the individual scripts into individual files will still work and won't cost you anything. > 2. When I use the ".innerHTML" method I notice that eventhough you can see > the representation with the browser, if you try to "viewsource" nothing > shows up. I'm thinking that If I output my script in the same manner I don't > have to bare my "script soul" to the world. Well I would guess that should be true either way? However, given the rather random behavior of IE at such times I have no real idea if that would be true. I suspect you could read in the entire JS file as a well formed XML fragment using document() by wrapping it in a CDATA. Start with a simple test and go from there. That will also tell you whether it is worth going to all the effort to go all the way... XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Using Transforms and #inc, Chris Bayes | Thread | RE: [xsl] Using Transforms and #inc, Hellstern, Manny |
[xsl] Building XML DOM from Access , Doug Howell | Date | [xsl] using variables and attribute, Eric Smith |
Month |