Subject: RE: [xsl] Next Node tests From: Ian_blizard@xxxxxx (Ian Blizard) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:03:02 +0000 |
Thanks for your help everyone, Jeni, David, Joerg and the numerous other who have helped me through to completetion of my XSL project, I salute you. Apologies for confusing 'user-error' woth 'sporadic behaviour', it just seemed bizarre that the same XML fiel transformed differently using the same XSL stylesheets on different machines. I'm off to hopefully contribute some more bugs through 'user-error'. -Buzz. -----Original Message----- From: joerg.pietschmann [mailto:joerg.pietschmann@xxxxxx] Sent: 15 November 2001 13:43 To: xsl-list Subject: Re: [xsl] Next Node tests Ian_blizard@xxxxxx (Ian Blizard) wrote > I'm now revisiting my stylesheets, I need to test whether or not the > current Item node is the last Item node in the current context. David already explained why your code may have "behaved sporadically". In addition to this, if you want to have a robust test not dependend on how the template was invoked, you may want to use something like <xsl:when test="not(following-sibling::item)"/> or <xsl:when test="not(following-sibling::*)"/> HTH J.Pietschmann XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Next Node tests, Joerg Pietschmann | Thread | Re: [xsl] Next Node tests, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] which file to include or , Joerg Pietschmann | Date | RE: [xsl] Call context within a nam, Jeff Beadle |
Month |