Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. client-side From: "Chris Bayes" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:30:20 -0000 |
> Boy, that seems a leap. Ever had to field the support calls > that come in when you upgrade a users browser from what they > are used to? (Or for that matter, ever had to manage the > support costs associated with upgrading 2000 copies of IE 5 > to use MSXML 3?) I have an automatic installation page on my site if you want to use that. Hey why don't we convert everything on the server to a gif + image map and send that to the browser? Oh damn then david wouldn't be able to see it with his lynx. Ciao Chris XML/XSL Portal http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, Chris Bayes |
RE: [xsl] Jeni reminds me....., DPawson | Date | Re: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, David Carlisle |
Month |