Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. client-side From: Jeff Kenton <jkenton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:39:28 -0500 |
I wasn't talking about stability, I was talking about users adopting the latest releases. For browsers in particular, 18 months is optimistic if you expect everyone to be using something new within that time frame. --jeff .. .. lifecycles are becoming fragmented, though this is a favorable marketing .. condition, not a good condition for creating stable software; versioning .. doesnt mean anything ( build number is more important ) any more as the lag .. between release and recieving feedback ( and subsequent patch ) on that .. release grows smaller and smaller. .. .. 5 years, those days are long gone...... or never were ? computing has only .. been around usefully for about 50-60 years or so; which means 5 years is .. approx 10% of the the entire lifetime of computing..... .. .. 18 mths is my timeline to stability with a heavy dose of risk analysis. .. .. cheers, jim fuller .. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, cutlass | Thread | [xsl] A riddle..., Christian Cäsar |
Re: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, Oleg Tkachenko | Date | Re: [xsl] Dynamic XSL Templates, Oleg Tkachenko |
Month |