Subject: RE: [xsl] positional predicates in XPath vs XQL From: "Howard Katz" <howardk@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 21:10:43 -0800 |
Fallacious raciotination obviously. I'll bite. What is the correct result in the XPath case?? Howard > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Christopher > R. Maden > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 7:45 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] positional predicates in XPath vs XQL > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > At 15:35 23-11-2001, Howard Katz wrote: > >In XQL if you say: > > /section/para[ 1 ] > >and you have a tree that looks like this: > > > >1 section > >2 para > >3 para > >4 section > >5 para > >6 section > >7 para > >8 para > >9 para > > > >you'll get back this nodeset: > > > ><2>, <5>, <7> > > > >To my understanding, the same location path in XPath only > returns a single > >node, <2>. Is my understanding correct? > > No. Whence did you acquire it? > > ~Chris > - -- > Christopher R. Maden, Principal Consultant, HMM Consulting Int'l, Inc. > DTDs/schemas - conversion - ebooks - publishing - Web - B2B - training > <URL: http://www.hmmci.com/ > <URL: http://crism.maden.org/consulting/ > > PGP Fingerprint: BBA6 4085 DED0 E176 D6D4 5DFC AC52 F825 AFEC 58DA > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8 > > iQA/AwUBO/8XtaxS+CWv7FjaEQIgdQCeJJkgv+IE9KMt1glpCot9/r0nF/YAn3cM > E9LJS5WYLPYO3ds6L5MIqPG8 > =g29q > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] positional predicates in , Christopher R. Maden | Thread | RE: [xsl] positional predicates in , Christopher R. Maden |
Re: [xsl] positional predicates in , Christopher R. Maden | Date | RE: [xsl] positional predicates in , Christopher R. Maden |
Month |