Subject: Re: [xsl] Counting Nodes From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 09:50:07 GMT |
> Is the following expression legal? No, because // is not legal as a complete expression, and therefore as an argument to | > The main stumbling block being the "//" by itself. exactly. > Usually, they work separately (i.e. count(//) and count(//@*) ), the second of those is fine, if the first one is not being reported as an error report it as a bug in whichever processor you are using. You want //node() > but there are sections which suggest that I can use it as a > node set, no it's short for /descendent-or-self/node()/ but that is not legal on its own either as it has a trailing / David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Counting Nodes, Peter Flynn | Thread | RE: [xsl] Counting Nodes, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Counting Nodes, Oleg Tkachenko | Date | Re: [xsl] Netscape changes font-siz, RICARDO BORILLO DOME |
Month |