Subject: RE: [xsl] document.write From: Jeremiah Brown <jbrown@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:04:01 -0500 |
I understand, and there's been a lot of bickering about xsl:script. But when I read the XSLT 2.0 requirements (at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20req )and see "Any stylesheet whose behavior is fully defined in XSLT 1.1 and which generates no errors will produce the same result tree under XSLT 2.0" --then I assume xsl:script will be in 2.0--as will everything else in 1.1 WD. I guess I'm not clear on what "defined in XSLT 1.1 and which generates no errors" means, since whether it generates errors depends on your implementation--and as you've said, xsl:script is not widely supported. (Yet, it's in 1.1 WD.) At any rate, my apologies for the confusion. -----Original Message----- From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:tpassin@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:45 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] document.write [Jeremiah Brown] > > there is no xsl:script element in XSLT. > > David: yes there is--it's defined in XSLT 1.1, section 14.4. Or, see pg 293 > of Kay's XSLT, 2nd edition. XSLT 1.1 is a draft of a version that will not happen, not a recommendation. So it's fair to say it's not in "XSLT". <xsl:script> is not widely supported. Tom P XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] document.write, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: XSLT 1.1 status (was [xsl] docu, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] document.write, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] document.write, Robert Koberg |
Month |