Subject: RE: [xsl] Selection based on date comparison From: Jeff Beadle <Jbeadle@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:42:58 -0500 |
sorry, after reading my replay I guess I should be a little clearer ... >> why not use a parser extension, like msxsl for msxsl. You could construct I meant "msxsl for msxml", in other words use msxsl:script elements. >> javascript date objects and compare them. -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Beadle Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:24 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] Selection based on date comparison why not use a parser extension, like msxsl for msxsl. You could construct javascript date objects and compare them. -----Original Message----- From: Dennis Campillo [mailto:dcampillo@xxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:15 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Selection based on date comparison >But the date format you choose is unsuited for compraision. Use >something like 20010603. >If you cant, you will have to use substring(). > Unfortunately, the date format is beyond my control at the moment, I understand I will have to use substring() in order to compare the dates. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Selection based on date c, Jeff Beadle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Selection based on date c, Brinkman, Theodore |
RE: [xsl] Selection based on date c, Jeff Beadle | Date | RE: [xsl] Selection based on date c, Brinkman, Theodore |
Month |