|
Subject: Re: [xsl] document() merge DISTINCT From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:07:31 +0000 |
Hi Alex,
[Sorry about the mis-send!]
> I wanted to try your other suggestion, using the node-set extention
> to get a unique set. But I can not get it right!
It's just a small thing. When you convert a result tree fragment to a
node set with msxsl:node-set() (and with the other node-set()
extension functions) then you get *the root node* of the 'node tree'
of the result tree fragment. So when you do:
msxsl:node-set($set)[generate-id() =
generate-id(key('k-id', @id)[1])]
Then you're testing only one node - the root node - which doesn't even
have an id attribute :) You need:
msxsl:node-set($set)/person[generate-id() =
generate-id(key('k-id', @id)[1])]
And from the looks of it, you should be fine.
I hope that helps,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] document() merge DISTINCT, Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] document() merge DISTINCT, Chris Bayes |
| Re: [xsl] document() merge DISTINCT, Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] is ID definition in DTD neces, Steve Renshaw |
| Month |