Subject: RE: [xsl] The evaluate function From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:43:01 -0800 |
Mark Feblowitz wrote: > Hmm? Are you saying that it's too early in the language's history to > introduce such a feature (and remove the assumption of static > expressions)? > If so, wouldn't it be an example of premature de-optimization ;-) I meant premature optimization in a more general sense, i.e. optimizing for particular processing models, implementation strategies, etc. at the expense of other potential approaches including databases, parallelism, etc. Evan XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] The evaluate function, Mark Feblowitz | Thread | RE: [xsl] The evaluate function, Joerg Pietschmann |
Re: [xsl] Hopefully not a terribly , Trevor Nash | Date | RE: [xsl] The evaluate function, Evan Lenz |
Month |