Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: xpath2 functions returning () From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 18:04:47 -0000 |
> So: > > (1, 2, 3)[2] > > is an error according to the XPath 2.0 WD, as far as I can tell. > > Which strikes me as rather peculiar, personally. > I think it's a bug. You're right, the spec does say "The expression in the general step must evaluate to a sequence of nodes". I'm fairly sure that what we MEANT to say was that a general step used as an operand of "/" in a path expression must evaluate to a sequence of nodes. I'll ensure this is flagged as an issue. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: xpath2 functions retu, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: xpath2 functions retu, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Queestion about postional, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Re: . in for, Jeni Tennison |
Month |