Subject: Where is the benefit ? (Was : RE: [xsl] The hard cocktail of sequence and (node-)set ..) From: "Kevin Jones" <kjouk@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 21:43:05 -0000 |
> However, while all comments are > welcome, I think > you would be wasting your time. We're now at the stage where people don't > want to reexamine the fundamental data model unless it's found to contain > very serious holes; and I think that while it isn't perfect, it > is workable. > Having had a quick look through the new specs I am confused at where the real benefit is for the XPath 2.0 changes other than a few extra functions. It's easy to see the improvements in XSLT 2.0 but the rest is just passing me by. Anyone care to try and pinpoint what is going to make XPath2.0 better rather than just different? Regards, Kev. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] The hard cocktail of sequ, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: Where is the benefit ? (Was : R, Jeni Tennison |
[xsl] RE: Re: xpath2 functions retu, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] Re: . in for, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |