Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: Re: xpath2 functions returning () From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 23:11:51 GMT |
> It is still unclear to me why the restriction was imposed that a > sequence should not have elements that are sequences. That's puzzled me as well, the automatic flattening of nested sequences that happens to maintain this restriction (and the complete loss of information about () values that were there) seems to generate more surprises than anything else. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] RE: Re: xpath2 functions retu, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Re: . in for, Dimitre Novatchev |
[xsl] Re: . in for, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: . in for, Jeni Tennison |
Month |