Subject: [xsl] RE: Higher-order function support as means to reduce the "standard" From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 11:41:26 -0800 (PST) |
> > Based on my brief example it is clear, that the standard > > language can be kept small, > > allowing at the same time any desired functionality to be > > easily implemented by > > programmers, based on higher-order function support. > > > > Let me say that I agree with you entirely on this. I wish I could convince > my colleagues. > > There are complexities, I'm sure, in extending the type system to handle > higher-order functions. But I'm sure that given a will, these could be > resolved. > > Mike Kay Mike, This would be really a great achievement. I would be happy if I can help with anything. Dimitre Novatchev. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ANN: An Introduction to X, Yvon Thoraval | Thread | [xsl] RE: Re: . in for, Dimitre Novatchev |
RE: [xsl] Re: . in for, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Re: Assignment no, dynamic sc, Mark Nahabedian |
Month |