Subject: Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e From: roger.day@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:33:32 +0000 |
At 10/01/2002 12:10:31, Joerg Pietschmann <joerg.pietschmann@xxxxxx> wrote: # roger.day@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: # > FWIW, and I'm just a person on the top of a Clapham Omnibus, if it's gotten rid # > of, there should be replacements - particularly for 4, which has recently bitten # > me. # # That was emmitting a document declaration with an internal DTD subset into the # result. # # > That's not an abuse - that's a workaround. # Hmmmmmm. Are you *sure* you can't do this in any other fashion? For example, # use the new multiple output facility to write a new DTD file and refer to it in # the result using doctype-system in xsl:output. Could you go into a little more detail, please? I haven't heard of this. # > However, isn't this covered by # > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#xml-output, Appendix F Representation of Lexical # > XML Constructs (Non-Normative)? So cases 3 and 4 should be fixed in XSLT 2.0 # > implementations....I think. # # My fix: drop DTD support (which includes dropping entity support). Use a XSchema # instead. # :-) :-) True, and I would dearly love to, but only when http://www.tei-c.org/ does so as well. I like to stick to some sort of standard. Roger XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, Joerg Pietschmann | Thread | Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, Joerg Pietschmann |
Re: mapping (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . i, Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] Re: Re: XPath expression to d, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |