Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Regular expression functions (Was: Re: comments on December F&O draft) From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 08:34:18 +0000 |
Hi Dimitre, [snip helpful description and references] > I'd rather have a function library, including a parser-generator > function that produces from a given set of syntax rules the > corresponding parsing tables (as XML that will be persisted just > once and used many times!) and parser function that will use as > parameters the necessary parsing tables, a reference to a lexical > analyzer function, and the input string to feed to the lex. > analiser. OK :) Is there anything about the parser-generator function or lexical-analyser function that would be hard to implement given XPath/XSLT 2.0? Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Re: Regular expression fu, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Re: Re: Regular expression fu, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Re: A question about the , Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] Re: Re: A question about the , Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |