Subject: Re: [xsl] Converting logical <em>s to physical <i>s (nesting problem) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:54:44 GMT |
> How can I convert <em>s to <i>s, such that "nested" <em>s are either > italic or not italic as appropriate? That is, I want do you really have to flatten the structure of your sentences in this way? An alternative would be to make em's all into <span class="x{count(ancestor::em) mod 2}"> .. </span> and just arrange that class x0 and x1 toggle the italic/upright font style. > By the way, what's the best was to "pass through" unknown tags? I > currently use > > <xsl:template match="*"> > <xsl:element name="{name(.)}"> this is an example in the xslt 1 spec. replace your <xsl:element name=..> by <xsl:copy> David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Converting logical <em>s to p, Michael Stillwell | Thread | [xsl] Fw: develop content managemen, Robert Koberg |
RE: [xsl] Get an element with max. , bryan . s . schnabel | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: RE: Higher-Order Func, Terje Norderhaug |
Month |