Subject: Re: [xsl] attribute order From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:00:31 GMT |
> (There is universal consensus that in XML, element order is important but > attribute order isn't. There is nothing explicit in the XML specification > that says this, but it's made clear in the definition of the InfoSet.) Actually a sentence making this explicit was added in XML 2e: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006-review.html#sec-starttags ... Note that the order of attribute specifications in a start-tag or empty-element tag is not significant. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] attribute order, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] attribute order, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] attribute order, Andy Joslin | Date | RE: [xsl] attribute order, Andrew Welch |
Month |