Subject: Re: [xsl] Lost Attributes? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:31:47 GMT |
> I didn't want it to be converted to > "& eacute;". But if I do use xsl:copy-of I retain my XM1 characters > in my output Unless you have a very strange implementation, teh way characters are serialised (as character data or as numeric references) is not affected at all by the way the characters were placed into the tree (with copy-of or value-of or literal text nodes etc. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Lost Attributes?, Mike Ferrando | Thread | Re: [xsl] Lost Attributes?, David Carlisle |
[xsl] How to define a xsl to displa, shenjun | Date | Re: [xsl] Findings: Merging XSL:FO , Jeni Tennison |
Month |