Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL v. XSLT From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:17:56 -0700 |
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 09:04:52PM -0800, Ross Lambert wrote: > XSL was--and is--a "catch all" for everything having to do with transforming > XML from one form to another. As things evolved, it grew in three strands, a > transformation language (XSLT), a searching language (XPath), and XSL to > specify output styles. It gets a little fuzzy because you can't really do > one thing without help from the others. You'll also find people using the term "XSL" (incorrectly) to refer to the transformation language Microsoft implemented in IE5, which was a subset of an early draft of XSL (before XSLT existed). -- Matt Gushee Englewood, Colorado, USA mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.havenrock.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSL v. XSLT, Ross Lambert | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSL v. XSLT, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Article: Dynamic Functions us, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | RE: [xsl] Special Characters displa, Michael Kay |
Month |