Subject: RE: [xsl] More efficient way than following-sibling? From: "Oleg Tkachenko" <olegt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:59:11 +0200 |
Hello Michael! > I am trying to find a more efficient way to determine if a node has > siblings, and then access the next sibling. > > Currently, I am running the following XSLT code: > > <xsl:if test="$TheNode/following-sibling::node()"> > <xsl:call-template name="GenericTemplate"> > <xsl:with-param name="TheNode" > select="$TheNode/following-sibling::*[1]"/> > </xsl:call-template> > </xsl:if> > > However, this is very expensive, when it comes to large XML documents. > > Does anyone know a more efficient way to do this? The most efficient way I believe is to eliminate preliminary testing at all: <xsl:apply-templates select="$TheNode/following-sibling::*[1]" mode="foo"/> <xsl:template match="node() | @*" mode="foo"> <xsl:call-template name="GenericTemplate"> <xsl:with-param name="TheNode" select="."/> </xsl:call-template> </xsl:template> --- Oleg Tkachenko, Multiconn International, Israel XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] More efficient way than f, Peter Davis | Thread | RE: [xsl] More efficient way than f, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] More efficient way than f, Peter Davis | Date | Re: [xsl] Wrox book still the best , G. Ken Holman |
Month |