RE: [xsl] why is it worked out?

Subject: RE: [xsl] why is it worked out?
From: Jarno.Elovirta@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:43:28 +0300
Heppa,

> <xsl:if test="not(following-sibling::item[not(@db-end) and 
> not(@db-start)] 
> or
>                   following-sibling::item
>                   )">
> surprisingly enough to me it worked allright.
> could someone please explane what is going on inside of test=""?

"If there are following "item" siblings or following "item" siblings that do not have "db-end" or "db-start" attributes, evaluate to false; otherwise evaluate to true." ... I think...

Santtu

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread