Subject: RE: [xsl] passing intermediate result while recursively building nodeset From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 14:51:24 +0100 |
> On Fri, 3 May 2002 18:31:15 > Michael Kay wrote: > >So the question is, what are you actually trying to achieve? > > Given a string, I need to create an element to represent each > word of that string. The created element is relatively > complex, and when creating the element for word 'i' I may > need to go back and examine the elements for words 1 thru (i > - 1) -- with order being important. But at the end of it > all, I'll need those newly created elements and in the order > they were created. Is that of any help? And please, if my > explanation leaves something to be desired, feel free to ask > for clarification. > I agree with Jeni's reply (as always), a 2-phase approach seems right - provided you don't actually mean that you need information about word (i-1) in order to decide where the word-break for word (i) occurs. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] passing intermediate resu, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] passing intermediate resu, paul morgan |
Re: [xsl] data translation => desce, Joerg Heinicke | Date | [xsl] xpath - how to return all nod, Scott Zagar |
Month |