Subject: RE: [xsl] Possible MSXML 3 / 4 bug: using a for-each on xsl:vari able / tre e-frag is misbehaving From: Jeff Beadle <Jbeadle@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 11:14:08 -0400 |
David, Thanks for your feedback/help ... and how you described the RTF as "effectively creates a new document" is exactly how I'll be thinking of it. Thanks again, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:04 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Possible MSXML 3 / 4 bug: using a for-each on xsl:vari able / tre e-frag is misbehaving > I thought that each time you execute a "select" that you're dealing with an > RTF, No RTF are only made when you use xsl:variable with non empty content, which effectively creates a new document. select= selects nodes in the available document(s), the result is a node set, a subset of the nodes in the source documents. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] I want to limit the numbe, Stuart Celarier | Thread | [xsl] unresolved problem using html, longjohn |
Re: [xsl] Possible MSXML 3 / 4 bug:, Oleg Tkachenko | Date | Re: [xsl] Problem using preceding-s, Jeni Tennison |
Month |