Subject: Re: [xsl] Document() and & From: "Charles Knell" <cknell@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 15:03:33 -0700 |
Sory folks. I was having another problem which I mistook for the & red herring. Once I solved the *real* problem, the cosmetic one of &, while still ugly, didn't interfere. Thanks for the slap. I need that sometimes when I get hysterical. -- Charles Knell cknell@xxxxxxxxxx - email ---- "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [Charles Knell] > > And I would be happy to use escaped or unescaped in the original > string, > > but either way, I'm getting the unusable "&" embedded in the > URL > > which appears as the value of the src or rel attributes in the resulting > > HTML document. > > > > But "&" **does** work, at least in anchor elements as the href > value. > i haven't tried it for the "src" attribute. > > Tom P > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Document() and &, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] regarding the extension libra, william locksman |
[xsl] new to XSl/variable usage, Rajesh . Jayabalan | Date | [xsl] Okay, so you can't do dynamic, Michael Peet |
Month |