Subject: RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 14:46:32 +0200 (CEST) |
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Michael Kay wrote: I guess it is unfair to mention namespaces in same context as XML Schema It takes some time before you get used to them, but they are often very useful and in my opinion the namespace specification is a rather good one. I cannot say the same about XML Schema : http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-use/mail-archive/msg00225.html > > Enough W3C members could get their AC reps to say No when it > > comes up for PR and it could be sent back to the WGs for > > reconsideration. > > Unfortunately those AC reps are the same people who voted to make XML > Schema a rec: getting people to admit that they have made a big mistake > is an uphill struggle, especially when the decision to endorse XML > Schema is reflected in their committed product strategy. > > I wish XML Schema would go away (I still wish namespaces would go > away...) but it won't. > > Michael Kay > Software AG > home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx > work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > -- ****************************************** <firstName> Miloslav </firstName> <surname> Nic </surname> <mail> nicmila@xxxxxxxxxxxx </mail> <support> http://www.zvon.org </support> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, Jim Melton |
RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, Francis Norton |
Month |