Subject: Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:40:03 -0400 |
[Michael Kay] >... > I think the principle of matching on types rather than on names is > sound, though. When XML is used in application integration scenarios the > size of the vocabulary can reach tens of thousands of element and > attribute names, but the number of types is typically much smaller. I > think that being able to write template rules that transform a date, or > a national insurance number, regardless of the name of the element or > attribute that contains it, will be a significant benefit for people > managing big integration projects. I've done some consultancy work with > a Software AG client recently where it would definitely have been a > help. > Aha, Architectural Forms through the back door, eh? Cheers, Tom P XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Why XSLT?, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] xsltproc (was Re: XSL-Lis, Thomas B. Passin | Date | Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, David Carlisle |
Month |