RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema

["Mark Wonsil" <wonsil@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Mr. Melton concludes:
> My conclusion is this: As bad as many observers and
> participants think XML
> Schema to be, it is appropriate for it to be the basis for
> XQuery 1.0,
> XPath 2.0, and XSLT 2.0.  To hope that the various Working
> Groups will "see
> the light" and choose to use a schema-like facility defined
> outside the W3C
> is highly unlikely.  An tremendous investment has already
> been made in XML
> Schema by many companies (including mine, of course) and I am highly
> skeptical that they will toss that investment away lightly.

Are you suggesting that if we build it, they will come?  Instead of reciting
the "good money after bad" line, I will leave you with this thought:

Microsoft Bob/Office Assistant

;-)


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list