Subject: [xsl] Re: XSL-List Digest V4 #421 From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 15:47:34 -0600 |
> From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Most popular XSLT processors are written in Java, Python, or Perl: > > > Saxon, Xalan, 4XSLT ... xsltproc is faster than them by a wide and > > > probably permanent margin. > > > > I don't want to get into a which is faster debate but this is > > really suspect. > > > If you are measuring a single-shot transformation executed from the > command line then of course the Java processors have a big disadvantage > because the Java VM takes 5 seconds or so to warm up. So as always, > different people will get different answers if they measure different > things. Good point. I will refrain from blanket speed comparisons in the future. -- Matt Gushee Englewood, Colorado, USA mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.havenrock.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Is this right for a key?, jestoll | Thread | [xsl] XSL-FO discarding space befor, Sandy McArthur |
Re: [xsl] xsl to HTML, Joerg Heinicke | Date | [xsl] XSL-FO discarding space befor, Sandy McArthur |
Month |