Subject: RE: [xsl] Grouping and Sorting on value inside group From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 12:36:16 -0500 |
> I still maintain that you would be better off ordering your groups using the > values of the $sortcol rather than using the Muenchian method and a cunning > (but alas ineffective) sort. Once you've got the a series of current > @dataids in the right order you can use key to get all the relevant nodes. > If as you explain, the columns are quite complicated things it will still be > easier doing it this way. Tom, that may well be. As I mentioned, you and David have got me to look at alterantive ways to do this and I'm going to some other approaches. In particular, the current version was developed when the grouping requirement was added after the fact for a previously developed template. Doing away with the original template, and restructuring everything (perhaps with the structure you suggest, but possibly with a completely different attack) is quite possibly the way to go. > so <xsl:key name="dataset" match="dataset" use=" 'all' "/> > and key("dataset", " 'all' ") > doesn't work? Frayed knot... I'm still looking at why not. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Grouping and Sorting on v, TSchutzerWeissmann | Thread | Re: [xsl] Grouping and Sorting on v, Jeni Tennison |
[xsl] Format number problem, AXRAMAKR | Date | RE: [xsl] FO questions about blocks, Gustaf Liljegren |
Month |