RE: [xsl] Template priority

At 10:31 AM 6/18/02 -0500, you wrote:

Thanks very much to everyone who replied to my question. An extremely helpful mailing list!.

Brian, noticed that all your answers said to use the parent/child tests.
That makes sense if the parent child relationship is static.  However, if
it's not, and your attributes are well defined there is no reason not to
select on attribute instead

In this case the parent/child relationship is well defined, but most of the attributes are optional, and those which aren't optional are identical, so differentiating using the attributes wouldn't work. In a different scenario, that could well be the way to go.

Regards,
Brian

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Template priority, (continued) Christopher R. Maden - Mon, 17 Jun 2002 20:09:43 -0700 Peter Davis - Mon, 17 Jun 2002 22:19:47 -0700 Michael Kay - Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:02:14 +0100 Hunsberger, Peter - Tue, 18 Jun 2002 10:31:13 -0500 Brian Grainger - Tue, 18 Jun 2002 22:11:09 -0600 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] Template priority, Hunsberger, Peter	Thread	[xsl] XSL getting started, Ingo Weiss
Re: [xsl] Hello World, G. Ken Holman	Date	[xsl] display Norwegian letters in , Aradhana Liyanage
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home