RE: [xsl] Hello World

Subject: RE: [xsl] Hello World
From: Jeff Beadle <Jbeadle@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:24:16 -0400
got it ... thanks for your help David.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 5:15 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] Hello World



  but element (the only element, therefore also the doc ele) is not defined
as
  a stylesheet element its an "a" element that has an xslt 1.0 namespace
  declaration within its context ... but it doesn't belong to the namespace
  nor is it an xslt stylesheet element.  

  So is the xslt version attribute declaration still needed?

Yes that's the second case (2.3) in the message of mine that you quoted.
I called it "simplified syntax" teh spec calls it "literal result
element as stylesheet". In this case you need an xsl:version attribute.
(as opposed to the version attribute on xsl:stylesheet)

David



_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread