Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not? From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:13:41 +0100 |
> > Will it do the same for X[name()='factorof' and position()=1] ? > I'm still thinking about that. XPath 1.0 doesn't allow the processor to re-order the branches of an "and" expression (the behavior in error cases might be different); but XPath 2.0 does allow it. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient o, Wendell Piez | Thread | [xsl] Schema Optimsations Was XSL: , Kevin Jones |
Re: [xsl] Lifting xml values to use, Jarkko . Moilanen | Date | Re: [xsl] Lifting xml values to use, Jarkko . Moilanen |
Month |