Subject: Re: [xsl] XML to plain text : which processor best to use ? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:55:06 +0100 |
> but also I need to be > able to manage perfectly blank spaces and carriage returns. > So I was wondering which processor to choose (Xalan, XT, others...) for > doing this, with eventually some special extensions (OutputHandler ?) for > managing correctly carriage returns and blank spaces. It seems that most > processors does not handle carriage returns very well without extensions... The XSLT standard gives you full control over white space output without using any extensions. So this shouldn't need to be a factor in determining which processor to use. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XML to plain text : which pro, bruno . o . faure | Thread | RE: [xsl] XML to plain text : which, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] XML/XSLT Problem, paul_dick | Date | RE: [xsl] XML/XSLT Problem, Paul Brown |
Month |